There have been those who have said that books are art, and I believe that can be true in reverse. Both invoke feelings in a viewer and can even change opinions. In the case of the pictures we saw most were political. There was one that was on a political issue (The Freedman's Bureau) and another showing what was happening in New York.
It is important to have relics like this from the past and they can really give a new perspective on something you thought you knew so much about. I have a question though. Does anyone think that art is often looked over in comparison to literary works when researching?